Of course Stormfront.org provides a wide buffet of hate on
many different topics. Any topic that can have an opinion on it, most likely
already has a year long + thread on it. I remembered back in the 2nd post, when
we had to use the forums on Stormfront.org to describe and reflect on what was
being said about our specific topic. I found tons of movie reviews and lists. However,
almost every thread that had to do with cinema of any sort referenced this
website as kind of a handbook of what movies were acceptable by white
nationalists. The website is called Yggdrasil's Movie List.
This site's intro talks about the white nationalist movement
as Euro-American survival. From there, the website really takes off. The site
rants about the media's attack on white nationalists and white people in
general. The introduction to the site just lends more to the notion that white
nationalists are paranoid of about the conspiracy theory of Jewish control on
the media. Actually, the website itself calls for the cancellation of
cable/satellite subscriptions and suggests their list a substitution to their
normal entertainment. The suggested media library would be a quality substitute
to cancelled cable services.
In the site's eyes there is a three pronged attack against
"us,"
A. Getting us to accept and feel comfortable with the Hollywood image of ourselves as stupid, incompetent,
insensitive, boorish, promiscuous and cowardly - all as a means of getting us
to submit to our subordinate role in the multi-cultural scheme.
B. Getting us to accept and feel comfortable with the notion
that we are not valid human beings unless we are in the company of negroes and
being supervised and managed by the Hollywood
image of the all-knowing, wise, and sexually disinterested negro.
C. Getting us to accept non-whites as attractive sexual
partners by constantly portraying interracial laisons, and especially, by
promoting the Hollywood image of the inner party male as the only sensitive and
understanding partner for White females, and by promoting the Hollywood image
of the black male as the only verile, agressive and masculine partner for White
females.
The site talks about ideals and disqualifying features… I
hate to copy and paste but this is seriously the best way to portray it…
1. Positive portrayal of whites in defense against the
depredations of liberalism, crime, and attack by alien races.
2. Positive portrayal of heterosexual relationships and sex,
marriage, procreation and child rearing.
3. Positive portrayal of impulse control and behavioral
restraint - consideration of the feelings of others and of community mores.
Positive portrayal of initiative, hard work, achievement, sacrifice for the
common good, - discrimination, self discipline, and sexual patience in mate
selection.
4. Portrayals of white males as intelligent, sensitive and
strong - in positive leadership roles and or romantic leads.
5. Particularly intense portrayals of white female beauty,
in non-degrading roles.
However, given the realities of Hollywood , the primary criteria for
appearance on the list are the absence of the following disqualifying
features.
1. Disgusting scatological imagery or excessive vulgarity
(Belle de Jour, Mall Rats, Van Wilder, American Pie, Road Trip, etc, ad
infinitem).
2. Sympathetic or attempted erotic portrayal of homosexual
and lesbian conduct and themes, and non-critical portrayals of violent sex (The
Election, Mulholland Drive
- Leaving Las Vegas).
3. Period pieces with so much un-historical overt sexuality
or depravity that they amount to revisionist denials of 20th Century cultural
decline. (Numerous examples, but Elizabeth with
Cate Blanchett is typical of the genre as is Cold Mountain .)
4. Portrayal of White males as stupid losers or sadistic
criminals. (Too numerous to mention)
5. Romantic comedies which portray visibly IP males as
sensitive loving types who are worthy of the shiksa's heart, as contrasted with
their brutal and insensitive White male competitors. (Where the Heart Is - with
Natalie Portman ironically playing the Shiksa, all Adam Sandler and most Seth
Green and Ben Stiller movies).
*all Jewish actors I
must add
6. Interracial sex, romance, and marriage propaganda (The
King and I, South Pacific, Love is a Many Splendored Thing, Guess Who's Coming
to Dinner, View to a Kill, Save the Last Dance, Road Trip, The Fast and The
Furious.)
7. The theme that Whites are not valid humans unless they
have the all-knowing and wise Negro managing, leading or helping them. (To Sir
with Love, Save the Last Dance, almost all Denzel Washington movies)
Denzel in Remember the Titans, example of "Negro managing"
8. Negative portrayals of Christianity or the Catholic
Church (The Blues Brothers).
Blues Brothers negative portrayal of Catholic Church
*videos, captions and asterisks were all added by me
The site also goes onto make sense of the list of movies the
site offers and how they are rated. It calls for whites to further themselves
away from the mainstream media that portrays them in a negative light. These
movies are meant to guide whites into movies that are suitable, and more
favorable to them. It just makes more sense to the idea that whites are the
victim and fighting an oppressive war on the image and portrayal of the white
man.
This list intends to list at least a 1000 movies up to its
criteria. That's a ton of movies… The whole idea of Jewish people having
control over the media and cinema is absurd. Society as a whole has changed
throughout the years with integration. The victim card that white nationalists
play is a weak argument for a change in society that is still a work in
progress. They feel censored in present day media, yet want to censor any movies
that don't fit their criteria.
This website is a good tool for white nationalists to find
movies that fit their criteria, but the blocking of other movies can really
narrow perspective and the realities of modern day culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment